XVI. SUPERSEDEAS AND EMERGENCY MOTIONS
Rule 40. Supersedeas and Emergency Motions.
(b) Emergency Motions.
In the exercise of its inherent power, this Court may issue such orders or give such direction to the trial court as may be necessary to preserve jurisdiction of an appeal or to prevent the contested issue from becoming moot. This power shall be exercised sparingly. Generally, no order shall be made or direction given in an appeal until it has been docketed in this Court.
A Rule 40 (b) motion shall:
(1) Contain an explanation why an order of this Court is necessary and why the action requested is time-sensitive;
(2) Contain a stamped “filed” copy of the order being appealed;
(3) Contain a stamped “filed” copy of the notice of appeal, if one has been filed in the trial court;
(4) Show that service was perfected upon the opposing party contemporaneously with or before filing the motion with the Court; and
(5) Be accompanied by the filing fee or evidence that one or more of the fee waiver provisions of Rule 5 apply, unless the motion is filed in a pending case already docketed with the Court. The filing fee shall be in the amount set out in Rule 5, Filing Fees.
(c) Original Petitions.
In the exercise of its power under Ga. Const. Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. IV this Court may issue process in the nature of mandamus to the trial court as may be necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments. This Court’s original mandamus jurisdiction is narrow and will be exercised sparingly.
An original petition seeking mandamus shall contain the following:
(1) An explanation why an order of this Court is necessary and why mandamus jurisdiction lies in this Court rather than a superior court. This Court has original mandamus jurisdiction in order to effectuate its judgments, generally in situations when it has issued a judgment and opinion that the trial court later refuses to follow in the same case. In any other circumstance, an original mandamus petition filed in this Court must show why this Court has jurisdiction;
(2) The prior judgment of this Court, where applicable, that would be effectuated by an exercise of original mandamus jurisdiction;
(3) Sufficient material to apprise the Court of the issues, in context, and to support the arguments advanced; and
(4) Proof that service was perfected upon the opposing party and upon the officer whose compelled performance is required contemporaneously with or before filing the mandamus petition with the Court.
Failure to submit sufficient material to apprise the Court of the issues and support the argument may result in the dismissal or denial of the mandamus petition.

